Question 4
Mining: socioeconomic effects and its effect on air, land and water
10 marks
- Time to write
- About 20 minutes
Question
Question 4 · 10 marksDiscuss about the socioeconomic effects of mining operations, and how these affect the quality of the air, land, and water resources that we have.
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- DiscussEach point named and explained, not just listed.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 Socioeconomic effects 4 marks 7 min
- 2 Effects on air 2 marks 4 min
- 3 Effects on land 2 marks 4 min
- 4 Effects on water 2 marks 3 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min
Short on time? Trim steps 1–4 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.
Try it first. About 20 minutes for 10 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
Mining supplies the coal, metals and stone on which industry depends, so it is hard to do without. Mining operations are also regarded as one of the main sources of environmental degradation, and the people living near mines often bear the cost.
- Income and industry. Mineral belts draw whole industries. The Chhotanagpur belt supplies 60 per cent of the coal India consumes, and coal-based industries of every kind have grown around it, bringing work and income.
- Occupational hazards. Mining is hazardous work. Rock and roof falls, flooding and poor ventilation are the main dangers in underground mines, and explosions have killed many miners; surface mining is less hazardous than underground, and metal mining less than coal.
- Long-term illness. Mine dust causes the lung disease called black lung (pneumoconiosis), and radiation is a hazard in uranium mines.
- Displacement. Projects planned in forest areas can displace thousands of tribal people who lose their homes, and such suffering rarely has a satisfactory answer.
- Conflict over resources. At Sariska Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan, forest land was denotified and leased for mining; local people fought the mining lobby and filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Supreme Court in 1991.
Dust from mining operations is released directly into the air breathed by workers, and fumes from incompletely exploded dynamite are extremely poisonous. Methane also escapes from coal strata; it is a health hazard though not poisonous at the concentrations usually found in mine air. Waste from associated industry adds further air pollution.
Mining uses up available land, and land is further lost to waste and conversion to industry, while industrial wastes pollute it. At Sariska, as many as 70 mines operate close to the forest, which shows how a mine's footprint spreads into protected land.
Water is polluted by industrial wastes that accompany mining. The Damodar river is the clearest Indian case: it flows through one of the richest mineral belts in the world, and coal-based industries there discharge fine coal particles and oil into it.
Mining brings income but leaves its costs on workers, displaced communities and on the region's air, land and water. Safe practice, strict pollution control and real consent of those affected are needed if its benefits are to outweigh those costs.
Where the 10 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Socioeconomic effects | 4 |
| 2 | Effects on air | 2 |
| 3 | Effects on land | 2 |
| 4 | Effects on water | 2 |
| Total | 10 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID2101-Q4already filled in.