Question 6 (a)
Public goods versus common resources, and why education is not a pure public good
6 marks
- Time to write
- About 12 minutes
Question
Question 6 (a) · 6 marksExplain the difference between public goods and common resources. Explain why Education is not regarded as the pure public goods?
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- Explain…Explain…?Two asks in one question: answer both.
- difference betweenSet the differences out in a table, basis by basis, not as two separate essays.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 The two properties, excludability and rivalry 1 mark 2 min
- 2 Difference between public goods and common resources, with their problems 2 marks 3 min
- 3 Examples of each 1 mark 2 min
- 4 Education: excludable and rival, so not a pure public good 2 marks 3 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min
Short on time? Trim steps 2 and 4 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.
Try it first. About 12 minutes for 6 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
Two tests for classifying goods. Goods are sorted by two properties:
- Excludability: whether people who do not pay can be kept from using the good. A good is non-excludable when keeping anyone out is extremely hard, or possible only at an extremely high cost.
- Rivalry: whether one person's use reduces the quantity left for others. A good is non-rival when it does not.
A good that is both excludable and rival is a private good; one that is non-excludable and non-rival is a pure public good.
Public goods and common resources compared. Both are non-excludable, so they differ only on rivalry.
| Basis | Public good | Common resource |
|---|---|---|
| Excludable? | No | No |
| Rival in use? | No: my use leaves as much for you | Yes: what I use is not left for you |
| Problem it creates | Free riding: people enjoy it without paying, so the market supplies too little | Over-use: each user ignores the harm to others, so it is used beyond the efficient level, the tragedy of the commons |
| Externality behind it | Positive | Negative |
| Usual remedy | Provision by the government, judged by comparing total benefit with total cost | Clearly defined property rights, giving someone the power to exclude |
- Public good: a free-to-air cyclone warning broadcast on radio along the Odisha coast. No listener can be shut out, and one family hearing it does not weaken the warning for the next.
- Common resource: the groundwater under a Punjab village, drawn by every farmer's tubewell. Water one farmer pumps is not available to his neighbours (rival), yet no farmer can easily be stopped from sinking a well (non-excludable), so the water table keeps falling.
Why education is not a pure public good. Applying the two tests, education fails both:
- It is excludable. A school, college or coaching institute can admit only those who pay the fee or meet its entry conditions, and turn others away. Excluding non-payers is practical and cheap here, unlike for a cyclone warning.
- It is rival. A classroom has a fixed number of seats and a teacher has limited time. In a Delhi University college, a seat given to one student is a seat another applicant does not get, and a crowded class gives each student less attention.
So education has the two properties of a private good, not of a pure public good. That the government often provides it, free or at low fees, does not change this: whether a good is public depends on these properties and on whether non-payers can be excluded, not on who supplies it, and the dividing lines between the categories are not fixed. An online lecture open to all, before the server is congested, comes closer to being non-rival, but a fee or login can still exclude.
Conclusion. Public goods and common resources are both non-excludable, but a public good is non-rival and is under-supplied through free riding, while a common resource is rival and is over-used. Education is both excludable and rival, so it is not a pure public good, even when the state provides it.
Where the 6 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The two properties, excludability and rivalry | 1 |
| 2 | Difference between public goods and common resources, with their problems | 2 |
| 3 | Examples of each | 1 |
| 4 | Education: excludable and rival, so not a pure public good | 2 |
| Total | 6 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID2535-Q6aalready filled in.