Question 1 (b)(2)
The short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment
4 marks
- Time to write
- About 8 minutes
Question
Question 1 (b)(2) · 4 marksExplain the trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- ExplainEach point stated, then explained in a line or two.
What the paper leaves open
The paper prints the label (b) twice in Question 1; this is the second (b) (the Hindi twin labels the four parts (a) to (d)).
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 Meaning of a trade-off, inflation and unemployment 1 mark 2 min
- 2 The short-run trade-off stated 1 mark 2 min
- 3 Why it arises, in both directions, with an example 1½ marks 2 min
- 4 Conclusion ½ mark 1 min
Easy marks
- Step 1 opens with the meaning: a one-line definition, the quickest mark in it.
Try it first. About 8 minutes for 4 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
The same question was set as 2535-Q1b; this answer serves both.
Meaning of a trade-off. Because resources are scarce and have other uses, getting more of one thing usually means accepting less of another; this is a trade-off, and what is given up is the opportunity cost of the choice. Governments face trade-offs between their own goals too, as when a policy that makes incomes more equal weakens the reward for hard work and so lowers efficiency.
- Inflation is a sustained, steep rise in prices; it lowers the real income and purchasing power of people on fixed or low incomes.
- Unemployment means people who want work cannot find it, as when job seekers grow faster than jobs do; it lowers production and income.
Society would like both to be low at once.
The trade-off stated. One of the ten principles of economics is that society faces a trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the short term: a policy that brings unemployment down tends to push inflation up, and a policy that brings inflation down tends to raise unemployment. A related principle is that prices rise when the government creates too much money.
- Lower unemployment, higher prices. Suppose the government puts more money into the economy and spending rises. Spending on goods is demand backed by purchasing power. In a market where supply is unchanged and the number of firms is fixed, a rightward shift of demand raises both the equilibrium price and the quantity sold. To produce the larger quantity, firms need more factor services, including more workers. So more jobs come with higher prices.
- Lower inflation, more unemployment. If money and spending are cut back to curb rising prices, demand shifts to the left; with supply unchanged and a fixed number of firms, equilibrium price and quantity both fall. Firms then need fewer workers, so slower price rises come with fewer jobs.
- Example (our own): if a large rise in government spending lifts orders for garment units in Tiruppur, they take on more workers, but the same surge in spending also pushes up the prices of cloth, food and rent; if spending is then reined in to cool prices, orders fall and some of those workers lose their jobs.
Conclusion. In the short term, policymakers usually cannot push down inflation and unemployment together: a lower rate of one is bought with a higher rate of the other, and choosing between them is a trade-off like any other, with its own opportunity cost.
Where the 4 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meaning of a trade-off, inflation and unemployment | 1 |
| 2 | The short-run trade-off stated | 1 |
| 3 | Why it arises, in both directions, with an example | 1.5 |
| 4 | Conclusion | 0.5 |
| Total | 4 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID2555-Q1b2already filled in.