Question 1 (d)

Money advanced to obtain a divorce: recovery

6 marks

Time to write
About 12 minutes
Topic
Legality of object and void agreements
Notes
Crux notes

Question

Question 1 (d) · 6 marks

Mr. A gives money to Mrs. B, a married woman, so that she obtains a divorce from her husband, Mr. C. Mr. A promised to marry Mrs. B afterwards. If the promise is not fulfilled, can Mr. A recover the amount?

Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.

Before you write

Read off the question and its marks

12 minfor 6 marks

Write it in this order

  1. Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
  2. 1 Section 23: unlawful object, immoral or opposed to public policy 2 marks 4 min
  3. 2 Application to the facts, with the decided case 3 marks 5 min
  4. 3 Decision 1 mark 1 min
  5. Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min

Short on time? Trim steps 1 and 2 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks. End with step 3 in a line or two.

Try it first. About 12 minutes for 6 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.

Solution

Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.

Law. Under section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful if the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy, and every agreement whose object or consideration is unlawful is void. The courts treat an agreement whose object is to bring about the divorce of a married woman from her husband, coupled with a promise of marriage to her, as immoral and opposed to public policy.

Application. Mr. A gave money to Mrs. B, a married woman, so that she could obtain a divorce from her husband, Mr. C, and he promised to marry her afterwards. The object of the arrangement is the divorce of Mrs. B from her husband. In a decided case on the same facts (money advanced to a married woman to obtain a divorce, with her promise to marry the lender), it was held that the lender was not entitled to recover the amount, because the agreement had the divorce as its object and the promise of marriage made in those circumstances was against public policy.

Decision. The agreement is void under section 23. The court will not help Mr. A: he cannot recover the money, whether or not the promise of marriage is fulfilled.

Where the 6 marks sit

#ComponentMarks
1Section 23: unlawful object, immoral or opposed to public policy2
2Application to the facts, with the decided case3
3Decision1
Total6
Keyboard: ← → previous and next question, / search

Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID850-Q1dalready filled in.