Question 4 (a)

Choosing two self-occupied houses out of three

12 marks

Time to write
About 24 minutes
Topic
Income from house property
Notes
Crux notes

Question

Question 4 (a) · 12 marks

Ms. X owns three houses, and all of them are self-occupied. From the information below, suggest which houses should be opted as self-occupied, and determine accordingly her income under the head house property for the tax year 2026-27, from these figures:

ParticularsHouse IHouse IIHouse III
Valuation, municipal7000001000000800000
Rent, fair6500001000000750000
Rent, standard900000900000900000
Taxes, municipal10%11%12%
Insurance & Repairs3600065000180000
Interest on capital borrowed (the capital was borrowed to construct the properties)
Borrowing date11/8/20251/1/20012/4/2023
Interest of the current year16000010000030000
Interest for the pre-construction period, aggregate340000NA420000

Ms. X wants to opt for the old tax regime. (12)

Paper note: Set under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2024-25 (previous year 2023-24); answered under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax year 2026-27, so the year term moves forward by 3 years and every date in the question moves forward by the same 3 years, so that intervals, holding periods and ages are as printed. Every figure and name is as printed.

Reworded from the university paper: names and figures differ, the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.

Before you write

Read off the question and its marks

24 minfor 12 marks

Read from the question

  • income underHead by head: each income under its head, exempt items marked exempt, then the deductions and the tax.

Write it in this order

  1. Read the data; note exactly what is asked 2 min
  2. 1 Annual value of each house expected rent, municipal taxes 3 marks 5 min
  3. 2 30% deduction and interest, including pre-construction interest 3 marks 5 min
  4. 3 Self-occupied loss and the ceiling 2 marks 3 min
  5. 4 Comparison of the three choices 3 marks 5 min
  6. 5 Choice and income from house property 1 mark 2 min
  7. Check: arithmetic, units (₹, %), final answer underlined 2 min

Short on time? End with step 5's one-line decision, whatever happens: never leave the figures without it.

Try it first. About 24 minutes for 12 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.

Solution

Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.

Assumptions

  1. Ms. X has opted out of the default regime, as the question says. No business or professional income is given, so the option is taken as exercised in the prescribed manner along with her return under section 263(1) (section 202(4)(b)). Under the default regime the interest of section 22(1)(b) would not be allowed on a self-occupied house (section 202(2)(a)(v)); that clause does not name section 22(1)(c).
  2. Municipal taxes, at the stated percentage of the municipal value, were paid by her during the tax year (section 21(3)).
  3. Each house was finished no later than five years after the close of its borrowing year, and she furnishes the lender's certificate stating the interest payable on the capital borrowed and, if a new loan repaid any of it, the interest payable on that loan (section 22(2)(a)(ii), (4)), so the ceiling of ₹2,00,000 applies (section 22(2)(a)). For House II there was no pre-construction interest, so it was completed in the year of borrowing.
  4. Houses I and III were completed in a year for which the tax year 2026-27 is one of the five years over which pre-construction interest is spread (section 22(1)(c)). No part of that interest is shown as allowed under any other provision, so it is not reduced first (section 22(3)).
  5. Insurance and repairs are not deductible: the 30% deduction is the only allowance for them (section 22(1)(a)).

Step 1: each house if deemed let out

Only two houses can have a nil annual value as self-occupied (section 21(6)-(7)); the third is taxed on the rent it might reasonably fetch (section 21(1)(a)): the higher of municipal value and fair rent, but not more than the standard rent.

ParticularsHouse IHouse IIHouse III
Municipal value7,00,00010,00,0008,00,000
Fair rent6,50,00010,00,0007,50,000
Standard rent9,00,0009,00,0009,00,000
Expected rent = annual value7,00,0009,00,0008,00,000
Less: Municipal taxes (10%, 11%, 12% of municipal value)70,0001,10,00096,000
Net annual value6,30,0007,90,0007,04,000
Less: 30% of net annual value (section 22(1)(a))1,89,0002,37,0002,11,200
Interest of the current year (section 22(1)(b))1,60,0001,00,00030,000
One-fifth of pre-construction interest (section 22(1)(c))68,000—84,000
Total interest2,28,0001,00,0001,14,000
Income if deemed let out2,13,0004,53,0003,78,800

Step 2: each house if self-occupied

The annual value is nil, so the interest is a loss. Assumption (the question gives no completion dates or certificates): each house was completed within five years of the end of its borrowing year and she furnishes the lender's certificate, so the ₹2,00,000 ceiling of section 22(2)(a) applies, not ₹30,000. Two deductions are involved, and for the self-occupied houses together their aggregate may not exceed ₹2,00,000: Finance Act, 2026, section 38 amends section 22(2) so that the ceiling covers the deductions under clause (1)(b) and clause (1)(c) alike, and section 22(5) sets the same aggregate limit:

  • the interest of the current year (section 22(1)(b)): House I ₹1,60,000, House II ₹1,00,000, House III ₹30,000;
  • the one-fifth instalment of pre-construction interest (section 22(1)(c)): House I ₹68,000, House III ₹84,000.

Step 3: the three choices

House deemed let outIts incomeCurrent interest of the other twoTheir pre-construction instalmentsTogetherAllowed (ceiling ₹2,00,000)Income from house property
House I2,13,000(1,00,000 + 30,000) 1,30,00084,0002,14,0002,00,00013,000
House II4,53,000(1,60,000 + 30,000) 1,90,000(68,000 + 84,000) 1,52,0003,42,0002,00,0002,53,000
House III3,78,800(1,60,000 + 1,00,000) 2,60,00068,0003,28,0002,00,0001,78,800

Income from house property

Ms. X should specify Houses II and III as self-occupied, with House I deemed let out. Her income from house property for the tax year 2026-27 is ₹13,000 (₹2,13,000 from House I less ₹2,00,000, the ceiling on the ₹2,14,000 of current and pre-construction interest on Houses II and III), the lowest of the three.

What changed from the Income-tax Act, 1961

Under section 24(b) of the 1961 Act the ₹2,00,000 ceiling applied only to a loan taken on or after 1 April 1999; section 22(2) of the 2025 Act has no such date, so every house here qualifies. The as-set version (previous year 2023-24), in which House II's loan is dated before 1 April 1999, is given separately and reaches a different figure.

Where the 12 marks sit

#ComponentMarks
1Annual value of each house (expected rent, municipal taxes)3
230% deduction and interest, including pre-construction interest3
3Self-occupied loss and the ₹2,00,000 ceiling2
4Comparison of the three choices3
5Choice and income from house property1
Total12
Keyboard: ← → previous and next question, / search

Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID7351-Q4aalready filled in.