Question 4 OR

Controlling: definition, process, and its links with planning, organising and directing

15 marks

Time to write
About 30 minutes

From an older CBCS paper

Question

Question 4 OR · 15 marks

Define controlling. Explain the process of controlling. Discuss how planning, organizing, direction and controlling are related.

Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.

Before you write

Read off the question and its marks

30 minfor 15 marks

Read from the question

  • Define…Explain…Discuss…3 questions in all: answer every one.
  • processA process: the steps in order, one heading each.

Write it in this order

  1. Read; underline the asks; jot your points 2 min
  2. 1 Definition of controlling, and its nature 3 marks 5 min
  3. 2 The process of controlling, step by step 6 marks 11 min
  4. 3 Relationship among planning, organising, directing and controlling 5 marks 9 min
  5. 4 Conclusion 1 mark 1 min
  6. Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 2 min

Easy marks

  • Step 1 opens with the meaning: a one-line definition, the quickest mark in it.

Short on time? Trim steps 1–3 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks. End with step 4 in a line or two.

Try it first. About 30 minutes for 15 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.

Solution

Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.

Definition of controlling

Controlling is the management function of monitoring the organisation's performance against its goals. It consists of setting standards of performance, measuring the performance actually achieved, comparing the two and correcting any shortfall. Put simply, controlling is the manager's way of making sure that what is being done is what was planned.

Picture itControlling: definition, process, and its links with planning, organising and directing

1The standard goes on the wall: 98 parcels in 100 delivered within two days.

Deciding the yardstickA courier company sets a standard of 98 per cent of parcels delivered within two days.

2The weekly report brings the branch in at 90—she reads it twice.

Finding out what actually happenedWeekly reports show a branch at 90 per cent.

3She walks the yard and finds the why: two vans with their bonnets up.

Asking whyAnalysis shows two delivery vans out of service.

4Hired vans roll in, routes are redrawn, and the branch climbs back to standard.

Putting it rightThe manager hires temporary vans and reschedules routes, and the branch returns to standard.

The process of controlling

The process has five steps, and they have to be taken in this order, since each step uses the result of the one before it.

  1. Setting performance standards. Standards are the yardsticks against which performance will be judged. They may be quantitative, such as cost, revenue, units produced or time taken, or qualitative, such as goodwill or the morale of employees. They should be set so that they can be measured easily and kept flexible enough to be revised when conditions change. A quick-service restaurant in Hyderabad might fix the minutes a customer should wait to order and to collect the food.
  2. Measuring actual performance. Performance is measured objectively and reliably, by personal observation, sample checking, performance reports or ratios such as return on investment.
  3. Comparing actual performance with the standards. The comparison shows the deviation between what was expected and what was achieved; it is easiest where the standards are in numbers.
  4. Analysing deviations. Some deviation is normal, so the manager first fixes the acceptable range and concentrates on key result areas, the critical points, letting only significant deviations reach senior management, which is the idea of management by exception. The causes are then traced: unrealistic standards, a faulty process, too few resources, structural weaknesses or factors outside the firm's control.
  5. Taking corrective action. No action is needed while deviations stay within limits. Beyond them, the manager acts so that the deviation does not recur: training workers who miss production targets, adding people and equipment to a project running late, or, where the deviation cannot be corrected, revising the standard itself.

Two features of controlling show in this process. It does not close the management cycle: its corrective action is meant to improve future performance, so it leads back to planning for the next period; planning starts the management process and controlling completes it. And it is goal-oriented: it helps the organisation accomplish its goals, and also helps in judging whether the standards were sound, in using resources efficiently, in keeping order and discipline and in coordinating activities so that they all move in one direction.

How planning, organising, directing and controlling are related

The functions are interrelated, and in practice a manager rarely performs one in isolation from the others; it is often hard to say where one ends and the next begins.

  • Planning settles beforehand the work to be done and the people who will do it: it fixes the goals and the route to them.
  • Organising turns the plan into a working structure. It identifies the activities and resources the plan needs, groups tasks into departments and establishes who has authority and who reports to whom.
  • Directing puts the structure into motion by leading, motivating, communicating with and supervising the people who do the work.
  • Controlling checks whether the results match the plan.

The link between planning and controlling is the closest. Planning supplies the standards that controlling uses, so controlling without planning has nothing to measure against; and once a plan is in operation, controlling is needed to monitor progress and correct deviations, so planning without controlling is meaningless. Planning is not only forward-looking, since it draws on past experience, and controlling is not only backward-looking, since its corrective action improves future performance. Top management plans for the whole organisation; the structure is built and staffed according to those plans; directing makes sure they are carried out; and any gap between planned and actual results is taken up at the controlling stage.

An example shows the chain. A Tiruppur knitwear exporter plans to ship 50,000 garments in a quarter; it organises cutting, stitching and finishing units with supervisors for each; its managers direct and motivate the workers to meet daily targets; and controlling compares weekly output with the plan. When stitching falls behind, the firm adds a shift, and the next quarter's plan is set on the capacity it has actually seen.

Conclusion

Controlling completes the cycle that planning begins. Organising and directing carry the plan into action, and controlling measures the result and feeds what it learns back into the next plan, so the four functions work as one continuous process.

Where the 15 marks sit

#ComponentMarks
1Definition of controlling, and its nature3
2The process of controlling, step by step6
3Relationship among planning, organising, directing and controlling5
4Conclusion1
Total15
Keyboard: ← → previous and next question, / search

Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID280-Q4ORalready filled in.