Question 1 OR (b)
The contingency approach and how it differs from classical theories
9 marks
- Time to write
- About 18 minutes
- Notes
- Crux notes
Question
Question 1 OR (b) · 9 marksExplain the Contingency Approach to Management. In what way does it differ from the Classical Theories of Management?
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- Explain…What…?Two asks in one question: answer both.
- differ fromSet the differences out in a table, basis by basis, not as two separate essays.
What the paper leaves open
The cover prints the course as B.Com. (Hons) CBCS with maximum marks 75. This is read as a misprint: the paper carries the UGCF code for this course (2412081101) and five questions of 18 marks each (90), so it is treated as the December 2025 UGCF paper.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 The contingency approach and its propositions 3 marks 5 min
- 2 Contingency factors 2 marks 4 min
- 3 Differences from classical theories 3½ marks 6 min
- 4 Conclusion ½ mark 1 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min
Short on time? Trim steps 1–3 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks. End with step 4 in a line or two.
Try it first. About 18 minutes for 9 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
The contingency (situational) approach holds that there is no one best way to manage. The right structure, style of leadership, control system or method depends on the situation the organisation faces. Management's task is to identify the key features of the situation and choose the practice that fits them. Its central idea is often stated as if: then: if certain conditions exist, then a certain approach works best. It grew out of studies showing that successful organisations in different conditions were managed differently, and it is applied to particular theories too: managers are advised, for instance, to take a situational or contingency approach when applying Maslow's needs theory.
1Clipboard in hand, Nisha stands where the road forks: factory one way, studio the other.
There is no one best way to manageManagement must therefore diagnose the situation and choose the practices that fit it.
2On the steady factory floor, the thick rulebook and the org chart do the managing.
EnvironmentStable environments suit mechanistic, rule-based structures.
3In the fast-moving studio—bean bags, sticky notes, live charts—the rules stay loose.
EnvironmentDynamic environments suit organic, flexible structures.
- There is no universally best method of management.
- Effective management depends on the fit between the organisation's practices and its situation.
- Managers must diagnose the situation before acting.
- The approach combines the useful parts of earlier theories, applying each where it fits.
- It is practical and action-oriented.
- External environment: a stable environment suits a mechanistic structure with rules and hierarchy; a changing one needs an organic, flexible structure.
- Technology: unit, mass and process production need different spans of control and structures.
- Size: large firms need more formal rules and decentralisation than small ones.
- People: skilled, motivated employees respond to participative leadership; others may need closer direction.
- Strategy and tasks: routine tasks suit standard procedures; creative tasks need freedom.
Difference from classical management theories
| Basis | Classical theories | Contingency approach |
|---|---|---|
| Central claim | Universal principles apply everywhere; Taylor sought the one best method | No one best way; it depends on the situation |
| View of organisation | Closed system, focused on internal efficiency | Open system, interacting with its environment |
| Structure | Principles (hierarchy, unity of command, narrow span) meant to hold in most organisations | Structure chosen to fit environment, technology and size |
| View of people | Mainly economic beings | Varied; people differ and situations differ |
| Method | Prescriptive, derived from experience or time study | Diagnostic, based on research into situations |
| Role of the manager | Apply the principles | Analyse the situation and choose the fitting practice |
| Flexibility | Principles to be applied with judgement, but meant to hold widely | Adaptive by design |
Example. A government ordnance factory making the same items in large volumes may work well with a tall, rule-bound structure, while a mobile-app start-up in the same city needs small, flat, self-managing teams. A manager applying classical principles universally would be tempted to run both in the same way; the contingency approach explains why each is right in its own setting.
The contingency approach does not reject classical principles; it limits them to the situations in which they work. Its weakness is that it gives no ready answers and that identifying all relevant factors is difficult, but it reflects the reality that management must adapt to circumstances.
Where the 9 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The contingency approach and its propositions | 3 |
| 2 | Contingency factors | 2 |
| 3 | Differences from classical theories | 3.5 |
| 4 | Conclusion | 0.5 |
| Total | 9 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID7353-Q1bORalready filled in.