Question 3 (b)
Departmentalisation by function and by product; merits and demerits of functional departmentalisation
9 marks
- Time to write
- About 18 minutes
- Notes
- Crux notes
Question
Question 3 (b) · 9 marksAlso discuss Differentiate Departmentalization by Function from Departmentalization by product. Give also the merits and demerits of Departmentalization by Function.
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- Discuss…Give…Two asks in one question: answer both.
What the paper leaves open
As printed, the part opens "Also discuss Differentiate between"; it is read as asking for the differences between the two bases of departmentalization, then the merits and demerits of the functional basis.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 Meaning of departmentalisation; the two bases 2 marks 4 min
- 2 Differences 3 marks 5 min
- 3 Merits of functional departmentalisation 2 marks 4 min
- 4 Demerits of functional departmentalisation; choosing between the bases 2 marks 3 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min
Easy marks
- Step 1 opens with the meaning: a one-line definition, the quickest mark in it.
Short on time? Trim steps 1–4 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.
Try it first. About 18 minutes for 9 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
Departmentalisation is the process of grouping related activities and jobs into units (departments) so that they can be managed effectively. Common bases are function, product, territory, customer and process. (The paper note explains how the opening words of this part are read.)
- By function: activities are grouped according to the main functions of the business, production, marketing, finance, human resources, research, each under a functional head.
- By product: activities are grouped according to products or product lines; each product division has its own production, marketing and other functions under a product manager.
Differences between departmentalisation by function and by product
| Basis | By function | By product |
|---|---|---|
| Suitable for | Firms with one or a few related products that need deep specialisation in each function, including large ones | Firms with several distinct product lines |
| Decision making | Centralised | Decentralised |
| Flexibility for new products | Low | High; a new division can be added |
| Duplication of resources | Little; functions shared across products | High; each division has its own functions |
| Coordination | Difficult across functions; done at the top | Easier within each product |
| Kind of expertise built | Functional (marketing experts, finance experts) | Product |
| Management development | Narrow specialists | General managers |
| Who answers for profit | Only top management | Each product head |
| What is grouped | Similar activities (functions) | Products or product lines |
(The comparison follows the lines drawn in the standard texts.)
Merits of departmentalisation by function
- Simple and logical: it follows the natural division of business activities.
- Clear career paths within a function.
- Easier training and supervision of specialists in their own field.
- Easy control by top management, which keeps the important decisions.
- No duplication: facilities and staff serve every product, which saves cost.
- Expertise: each department concentrates on one function, raising efficiency.
Demerits of departmentalisation by function
- Unsuitable for diversified firms with many unrelated products.
- Slow decisions in a growing or changing environment.
- Responsibility for profit cannot be fixed below top management.
- Few all-round managers: each head knows one function only, so the firm has few people ready to run the whole business.
- Friction between departments: coordination is hard and conflicts are pushed up to top management.
- Departmental tunnel vision: departments pursue their own goals and may lose sight of the organisation's.
Example. A single-product biscuit maker organised into production, marketing, finance and HR departments benefits from specialisation, but when it adds snacks and beverages it may move to product divisions.
Functional departmentalisation suits a firm whose products are few and similar, whose environment is stable and whose main need is efficiency. Product departmentalisation suits a firm whose products differ in technology, customers or markets and which needs quick, product-focused decisions. Many large firms combine the two, product divisions at the top, functional departments within each division, or move to a matrix when both needs are equally strong.
Where the 9 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meaning of departmentalisation; the two bases | 2 |
| 2 | Differences | 3 |
| 3 | Merits of functional departmentalisation | 2 |
| 4 | Demerits of functional departmentalisation; choosing between the bases | 2 |
| Total | 9 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID204-Q3balready filled in.