Question 1 (b)
Coercion and undue influence
6 marks
- Time to write
- About 12 minutes
- Topic
- Free consent
- Notes
- Crux notes
Question
Question 1 (b) · 6 marksDefine coercion and undue influence. How do the two differ from each other?
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- Define…How…?Two asks in one question: answer both.
- How do the two differSet the differences out in a table, basis by basis, not as two separate essays.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 Coercion defined 1½ marks 2 min
- 2 Undue influence defined 1½ marks 2 min
- 3 Differences 3 marks 5 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 2 min
Short on time? Trim steps 1–3 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.
Try it first. About 12 minutes for 6 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
Coercion (section 15). Coercion means committing, or threatening to commit, an act that the Indian Penal Code forbids, or unlawfully detaining property or threatening to do so, to anyone's prejudice, with the intention of making any person enter into an agreement. A contract obtained in this way is voidable at the option of the aggrieved party.
1A raised lathi over the counter: the signature it forces is coercion.
CoercionCommitting, or threatening to commit, an act that the Indian Penal Code forbids
2At the sickbed, the nephew guides the trembling pen—position used, will dominated.
Undue influenceTo dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over
3Either way, the paper is the victim's to tear—voidable at his choice, not void on its own.
VoidableSuch a contract is voidable, not void.
Undue influence (section 16). A contract is induced by undue influence when one party is able “to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over” him. Such a contract is voidable, not void. Some relationship between the parties is essential, and the influence is always exercised between the parties to the contract.
| Basis | Coercion | Undue influence |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Physical force or threat; an act forbidden by the Penal Code, or detaining property unlawfully | Moral or mental pressure; no criminal act |
| Relationship | No relationship between the parties is needed | Some relationship between the parties is essential |
| By whom | Need not proceed from the promisor, and may be used even by a stranger to the contract | Always exercised between the parties to the contract |
| Effect | Contract voidable at the option of the party coerced | Contract voidable, or the court may set it aside or enforce it with modifications |
| Benefit received | On rescission, any benefit received must be restored (s. 64) | The court may direct the return of the benefit in whole or in part, or not |
Where the 6 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coercion defined | 1.5 |
| 2 | Undue influence defined | 1.5 |
| 3 | Differences | 3 |
| Total | 6 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID1504-Q1balready filled in.