Question 5 OR (a)

Appointment of a sub-agent and the principal's liability towards third parties

6 marks

Time to write
About 12 minutes
Topic
Agency
Notes
Crux notes

Question

Question 5 OR (a) · 6 marks

(OR)

  1. Discuss when a sub-agent may be appointed and when one may not be appointed? What difference will this make to the liability of the Principal towards third parties?

Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.

Before you write

Read off the question and its marks

12 minfor 6 marks

Read from the question

  • Discuss…?What…?2 asks, each with its own marks below. Answer both.

What the paper leaves open

Only a combined mark of 18 is printed for parts (a) to (c); each part is reckoned here at 6 marks (inferred).

Write it in this order

  1. Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
  2. 1 General rule against delegation and its exceptions (s. 190); sub-agent defined (s. 191) 3 marks 5 min
  3. 2 Principal's liability: properly appointed (s. 192) and unauthorised (s. 193) sub-agent 3 marks 5 min
  4. Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min

Short on time? Trim steps 1 and 2 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.

Try it first. About 12 minutes for 6 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.

Solution

Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.

When a sub-agent may be appointed (s. 190). An agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts he has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally (delegatus non potest delegare: agency rests on the principal's confidence in the agent). A sub-agent may, however, be employed where the ordinary custom of trade allows it, or where the nature of the agency requires it; the appointment is also valid where the terms of the agency originally contemplated it, or where an unforeseen emergency in the course of the agency makes delegation necessary. “A sub-agent is a person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the business of the agency” (s. 191).

Effect on the principal's liability:

  • Sub-agent properly appointed (s. 192): the principal is liable to third parties for the sub-agent's acts; the agent is responsible to the principal for them; and the sub-agent is responsible to the agent, not to the principal, except for fraud or wilful wrong.
  • Sub-agent appointed without authority (s. 193): the agent alone answers for the sub-agent's acts, to the principal and to third persons alike; the principal is not responsible for them, and the sub-agent answers only to the agent. Where a carrier handed the goods to another carrier and they were damaged in transit, the first carrier was held liable.

Conclusion. A properly appointed sub-agent binds the principal to third parties as the agent himself would; an unauthorised one does not, and the agent then bears the consequences himself.

Where the 6 marks sit

#ComponentMarks
1General rule against delegation and its exceptions (s. 190); sub-agent defined (s. 191)3
2Principal's liability: properly appointed (s. 192) and unauthorised (s. 193) sub-agent3
Total6
Keyboard: ← → previous and next question, / search

Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID202-Q5aORalready filled in.