Question 3 OR (b)
Product-based organisation structure: illustration, merits and demerits
9 marks
- Time to write
- About 18 minutes
- Notes
- Crux notes
Question
Question 3 OR (b) · 9 marksExplain product based organization structure and illustrate it. What merits and demerits does it have?
Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.
Before you write
Read off the question and its marks
Read from the question
- Explain…What…?Two asks in one question: answer both.
- illustrateExamples are asked for: one short example with each point.
Write it in this order
- Read; underline the asks; jot your points 1 min
- 1 Meaning of the structure 2 marks 2 min
- 2 Illustration chart 2 marks 4 min
- 3 Merits 2½ marks 5 min
- 4 Demerits and suitability 2½ marks 5 min
- Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 1 min
Easy marks
- Meaning of the structure (step 1, 2 marks): a clear definition and a line on what it covers. It opens the answer, so it takes a minute or two.
Short on time? Keep step 1 short. Trim steps 2–4 evenly rather than skip one: each is capped at its own marks.
Try it first. About 18 minutes for 9 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.
Solution
Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.
Meaning of a product-based structure
In a product-based (product departmentalisation or product divisional) structure, the organisation is divided into units on the basis of the products or product lines it makes. Each product division is headed by a manager who is responsible for all, or most, of the activities needed for that product, production, marketing, and often its own purchasing, finance and personnel, and for its profit. Common services such as legal affairs, corporate finance and research may stay at head office. It is a form of divisional structure and is used by firms with several distinct product lines.
An appliance company making three product lines would be organised as follows:
- Chief Executive
- Refrigerators Division: Manager; its own production, marketing, finance and human resources
- Air Conditioners Division: Manager; its own production, marketing, finance and human resources
- Washing Machines Division: Manager; its own production, marketing, finance and human resources
Each division head reports to the chief executive and is judged by the profit of the division. Head office keeps common functions such as legal, corporate finance and research.
- Better coordination within a product. All functions for one product work under one head, so production and marketing are easily matched.
- Product specialisation. Managers develop deep knowledge of one product, its technology, customers and competitors.
- Management development. Division heads manage a whole business and gain the general-management experience needed for top posts.
- Room to grow. Launching a product line means adding one more division beside the existing ones, whose work carries on as before.
- A scorecard for each head. Because a division's income and costs are its own, head office can see which divisions earn their keep and hold their heads to it.
- Speed. Decisions about a product are taken within its division, closer to the market.
- Unsuitable for small firms. It is economical only when each product line is large enough.
- Under-use of common facilities. Plant, sales staff or research that could be shared may be split and under-used.
- Need for many capable general managers. Each division needs a head able to manage all functions.
- Weak control by top management. Division heads may become too independent and pursue their own interests.
- Higher costs. Each division repeats production, marketing and staff departments.
- Divisions pulling apart. A head judged on one division's results may fight for a larger share of the firm's money, or chase that division's figures even when it costs the firm as a whole.
The structure suits large firms with several distinct product lines, each with different technology, customers or markets, and where quick, product-focused decisions matter more than economies of a single functional department. A small firm with one product line is better served by a functional structure, and a firm whose markets differ more by region than by product may prefer territorial divisions.
Where the 9 marks sit
| # | Component | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meaning of the structure | 2 |
| 2 | Illustration (chart) | 2 |
| 3 | Merits | 2.5 |
| 4 | Demerits and suitability | 2.5 |
| Total | 9 |
Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID885-Q3bORalready filled in.