Question 5 (a)

Marginal and differential costing; imputed and opportunity cost; relevant and irrelevant cost

12 marks

Time to write
About 24 minutes
Topic
Relevant costs and decision making

Question

Question 5 (a) · 12 marks

For each pair, state the differences between the two: (12)

  1. Differential costing; Marginal costing.

  2. Opportunity cost; Imputed cost.

  3. Relevant cost; Irrelevant cost

Reworded from the university paper; the task is the same. The original paper belongs to the University of Delhi. See DU's question bank.

Before you write

Read off the question and its marks

24 minfor 12 marks

Read from the question

  • (i)–(iii)3 items, each marked on its own: give each its share.
  • differences betweenSet the differences out in a table, basis by basis, not as two separate essays.

What the paper leaves open

Part (a) shows "(12)" beside its opening line; as (b) carries 6, the 12 marks are taken to belong to (a).

Write it in this order

The parts stand alone: start with the one you are surest of.

  1. Read; underline the asks; jot your points 2 min
  2. 1 Marginal and differential costing 4 marks 7 min
  3. 2 Imputed and opportunity cost 4 marks 7 min
  4. 3 Relevant and irrelevant cost 4 marks 6 min
  5. Check: every ask answered, key terms underlined 2 min

Short on time? A few lines on every part beat a full answer to one: each part is capped at its own marks.

Try it first. About 24 minutes for 12 marks. Write it out, then open the solution.

Solution

Hover or tap a marked figure, like 72,000, to see how it is made and where else it appears.

(i) Differential costing and marginal costing

Differential costing is the study of the difference in total cost (and revenue) between two alternatives, used to decide between them. Marginal costing is a technique in which only variable costs are charged to products and fixed costs are written off as period costs; it is used for cost-volume-profit analysis, pricing and product-mix decisions.

BasisDifferential costingMarginal costing
NatureA technique of analysis for a particular decisionA system of costing and of presenting profit
Costs consideredAll costs that change between alternatives, fixed or variableVariable costs only; fixed costs excluded from product cost
Fixed costsIncluded if they differ between alternativesAlways treated as period costs
Use in accountsNot part of the accounting records; ad hocCan be incorporated in the accounting system
MeasureDifferential cost and differential revenueContribution
ExampleCost of expanding output from 70% to 90% capacity, including a new shift supervisorContribution of each product per machine hour

(ii) Opportunity cost and imputed cost

Opportunity cost is the benefit given up by choosing one alternative over the next best: the value of the alternative forgone. Imputed (notional) cost is a hypothetical cost that does not involve any actual payment but is charged to make a comparison fair: for example, interest on the proprietor's own capital, or rent for premises the business owns.

BasisOpportunity costImputed cost
MeaningBenefit sacrificed from the best rejected alternativeNotional charge for using own resources
PurposeCorrect choice between alternativesFair comparison of performance or alternatives
NatureDepends on the alternatives actually availableA specific charge, often interest or rent
Recorded in booksNoNo (may appear in cost statements)
ExampleA machine used for product X forgoes ₹30,000 contribution it would have earned on product YInterest at 10% on owner's capital of ₹5,00,000 = ₹50,000

(iii) Relevant cost and irrelevant cost

Relevant costs are future costs that differ between the alternatives under consideration; only they affect the decision. Irrelevant costs are costs that will be the same whichever alternative is chosen, or that have already been incurred, and so do not affect the decision.

BasisRelevant costIrrelevant cost
TimeFuture costPast (sunk) or future but unchanged
Effect on decisionChanges with the decisionSame under every alternative
ExamplesVariable cost of an extra order; additional fixed cost of a new shift; opportunity costSunk cost of a machine already bought; allocated head-office overheads that continue anyway
TreatmentIncluded in decision analysisIgnored

Why the distinctions matter

All three pairs concern which costs should be considered in a management decision. Marginal and differential costing both look at costs that change, but marginal costing is a continuing system based on cost behaviour, while differential costing is a one-off comparison of two courses of action. Imputed and opportunity costs are both costs that do not appear in the financial accounts, but one is a fair charge for using one's own resources and the other the benefit sacrificed. The relevant-cost idea brings these together: in any decision, only the future costs and revenues that differ between the alternatives, including opportunity costs, should be counted, and sunk or common costs should be ignored. A manager deciding whether to accept a special order, for instance, compares the extra revenue with the differential cost of the order and any contribution given up, and ignores the fixed costs that will be incurred anyway.

Where the 12 marks sit

#ComponentMarks
1Marginal and differential costing4
2Imputed and opportunity cost4
3Relevant and irrelevant cost4
Total12
Keyboard: ← → previous and next question, / search

Report a problemopens an email to admin@getkunji.com with the question ID875-Q5aalready filled in.